Creativity – The Initial Spark

2. Writing furiously

I was thinking recently about creativity and the first thought that struck me was the initial act of creativity. As writers, we all know about the second and third and sixteenth drafts, and the critiques and so on, but what about the initial spark. What about that moment when you first pull the words out of the ether and put them together into a sequence that (hopefully) makes sense?

This set me thinking about writers going back a century ago, and their initial act of creation. It’s very different from writers today. Even just going back to the Forties or Fifties – before the advent of television and certainly before the advent of the internet – a writer sitting in a room was not bombarded with any of the things that they are now. There was no sensory overload. The writer sat – as many writers still do – with a pen and paper, or at a typewriter, but the mind worked differently. Many writers probably still sit quietly writing and don’t have all this external flotsam coming in, but I would imagine that’s increasingly less common. There’s this constant multi-tasking going on. Previously, if a writer got to a point where they needed to research something, they would have just made a note – “Need to research that” – and gone back to the writing, or gone off and picked up an encyclopaedia. But the speed which we can research something now is amazing. And, of course, this is not always a good thing. Because while you can research 18th century Parisian townhouses in a couple of Google clicks, this doesn’t make up for the two hours subsequently lost reading about the Three Musketeers. (No idea how I got to that page!)

For a long time – probably since the first person sat at a desk with parchment and a writing implement – writers pretty much sat at their desks and wrote. And they still do, but there are different ways of going about it now. I often use a Dictaphone, and it’s a much more off-the-cuff, stream-of-consciousness way of writing. So, I can be dictating whilst looking at something else, and all these ideas are coming at me, and I can stop and research, and so on. And oftentimes I’m just throwing down random ideas, rather than necessarily keeping on a constant train of thought. It’s an interesting way to work. It’s not a way that I used to work. And, funnily enough, when I dictate while I’m out walking, I actually write more “conventionally” because I’ll get on a roll and I’ll start to write an actual whole scene. When I’m at my desk dictating, oftentimes another idea pops into my head because of something I’ve just seen on the computer and I’ll go off on a tangent with that. And I know there are writers who would gasp in horror at the idea that you would write with all this going on around you, but I think that’s the difference between the initial writing and the later edits. I would find it impossible to edit and rewrite that way; for the later drafts, I have to work from hard copy and the computer has to be shut off. But it’s the initial phase that I’m interested in, and that initial phase of creation has certainly changed radically for writers in recent times and I think will continue to do so.

(Image: Click on pic for credits)

If you enjoyed this post, you can subscribe to the blog by entering your email address in the box on the left hand sidebar. Thanks!

Advertisements

6 comments on “Creativity – The Initial Spark

  1. Great post Derek – having come back to the real world today after ‘writing hibernation’ finishing the first draft of The Doll’s House, I’m afraid I needed keep away from all possible distractions! Blame Christmas, the winter flu bug for 3 weeks, or all the other stuff late last year, but when the chips were down, I had to go running for the hills or I woudn’t have gotten it done. Juggling is difficult, but now I get to catch up with everybody again, even if my family no longer recognise me!!!

  2. Sandy Hall says:

    This is a really interesting subject, Derek. I am wondering if all of the choices in method now make it easier for a writer to procrastinate when the muse just isn’t there. Also, it sounds as if writers prior to modern conveniences had it easier because of fewer distractions; yet, when I consider those writers had to go outside just for a quick bathroom break, or kill the chicken for the hasty dinner break between chapters, I’m not so sure it was easier. Some things, I’m sure, remain the same….the writer who, in days of yore, spilled ink all over the last two chapters would now most likely lose his hard drive with those same two chapters!

  3. Only commenting now because I have been pondering what you have posted here.
    The comments are also apt. I think all of us who write face many obstacles and it so true that these have changed in detail over time. The fundamentals seem to have remained the same.
    I like to walk WITHOUT a phone for at least thirty minutes a day. Inspirations often arrive then. I also like to listen to the world around me, including the random conversations of strangers, inspiration comes to me.
    I hate losing an idea and I also own a dictaphone. It was reassuring to realise I’m neither alone nor weird.
    This is a link to a poem I wrote a while back arising out of some of the issues you and others have raised. http://wp.me/p1x8WB-5i
    I love writing with a fountain pen fed from a bottle of ink. THe thoughts of ink spilling over uncopied work is horrifying! I stand warned!
    Kevin

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s