Loud. Quiet. Loud. The Dynamics of Writing

Someone asked me recently about the similarities between composing music and writing. It was something I hadn’t really thought about before. I’ve written a lot about the similarities and dissimilarities between songwriters and fiction writers, but mostly focusing on lyrics vs prose. I hadn’t actually thought too much about the actual process of composing the music.

I suppose the first thing that springs to mind is something I would call “dynamics”. This is, to my mind, hugely important to both bands and solo acts, but especially to solo acts. I’ve played with many bands over the years but – at the moment – I’m performing solo acoustic sets, so dynamics is hugely important for me.

What is dynamics?

Well, how do you give certain parts of a song more emphasis than others and make it so that the whole song doesn’t sound exactly the same? This is dynamics. I always think of the band “The Pixies” as one of the originators of dynamics. A documentary about them was called “Loud. Quiet. Loud.” and that to me sums up dynamics. You have a quiet verse, a blisteringly loud chorus, back to a quiet verse, and so on. Kurt Cobain was someone who learned a lot from The Pixies and borrowed this idea for Nirvana.

This is easier to do in a band than it is as one man with a guitar. So, as a solo performer you have to come up with ways to do this. One of the ways is to do something called “muting the strings”. So, in the verse, you mute or dampen the strings and play it quietly and then in the chorus strum like a madman!

So what has all this got to do with writing? Quite a lot actually. I think there are dynamics in writing as well. The Irish writer, Claire Kilroy, once suggested to me in a workshop that if you want to quicken the pace in a scene, writers can do something similar to create dynamics. Short sentences of dialogue or narrative can ramp up the tension, while long sentences or periods of exposition can have the opposite effect. There can be occasions when a writer may wish to employ both of these devices.

In movies, the soundtrack does this, the music becoming heightened and more dramatic as the action or tension increases. In novels, words have to do this. Imagine a scene where our heroine is walking down a long, dark, deserted hallway, when she realises she’s being followed.

“She could hear the footsteps approaching. Faster. Louder. She panicked. She tried the nearest door. Locked. Another door. Locked. Her heart pounded. She was trapped.”

This is a very simple example but it shows how the short, staccato sentences – sometimes only a word – can increase the pace and tension of a scene. In the next scene – so as not to wear the reader out – the writer could slow the tempo again, using an inner monologue, or describing the character’s surroundings.

Screenwriters and playwrights do this a lot. Aaron Sorkin is a great example. Watch any episode of The West Wing and you’ll see in the fast moving scenes the dialogue is snappy and rapid-fire; in the quieter scenes it’s more of a slow burn.

Loud. Quiet. Loud.

 

(Image: http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com)

If you enjoyed this post, you can subscribe to the blog by entering your email address in the box on the left hand sidebar. Thanks!

About these ads

9 comments on “Loud. Quiet. Loud. The Dynamics of Writing

  1. davidbeem says:

    Really enjoyed this one, Derek. You’ve got me thinking about the metaphor, and other ways to use it. Also, one question: Shouldn’t it be, “What are dynamics?” (Dynamics are a collection of volumes, right?)

    I also think of similarities in writing and music. For me, your example deals with varied phrase length, as pertaining to the intensity of the passage. (“She could hear the footsteps approaching. Faster.” That’s one of the things I enjoy about your song writing, btw.)

    I imagine loud scenes and intimate scenes when I write, and try to cram that subliminally into my reader’s ear through environmental cues, or psychological ones. (“Her breathing was steady, but too loud in her ears as the killer searched her house. She struggled to hold still, breath slower, but every sound seemed earth shattering in the silence.”) Or, you can contrast the two, and write loud environmental cues, but quiet, suspenseful inner ones. (For instance, a storm raging outside while she hides from the killer, and the reader has her experience of trying to remain silent juxtaposed against the violence of storm.)

    In music, I was always a “sound guy.” I loved creating a beautiful vibrato, or luscious tone. It’s what I miss most about not being able to perform anymore. I guess it’s no wonder this blog appealed to me/got my creative juices flowing. Thanks for sharing!

  2. Derek Flynn says:

    Thanks for the thoughtful reply, David. I did wonder should it be “What are dynamics?” but I meant the word in a singular sense, so I used “is”. I love your description of the different cues you use when writing. Spot on!

  3. Hmm… Definitely something to think about. I’ll remember this when I start going over my second novel before publishing it this holiday season. Thanks for sharing

    • Yes, I agree with your analysis of the dynamics of writing prose. Varying sentence lengths, paragraph style, location of dialogue are all tried and tested methods of holding the readers attention and keeping the writing alive. Working on a new piece right now and just before I read this post I had actually gone over it changing paragraph layouts, keeping the writing snappier and pacier as the material demanded.
      When doing public readings I am conscious of using the voice almost like a musical instrument, including the changes in volume and emphasis you wrote about. I can’t help but being irritated by readers who disrespect their audience by reading too quickly or in a monotone. I am a great believer in the effective “pause” being part of the performance, giving the audience a chance to absorb what has gone before or prepare for what might be next.
      Thanks for posting, enjoyed it as always, Kevin

      • Derek Flynn says:

        Very interesting analysis, Kevin, especially with regard to the live readings. Have you ever seen Neil Gaiman read? He’s a master of what you talk about.

    • Derek Flynn says:

      Thanks Jimmy. And best of luck with the second novel ;)

  4. This was a great post. Very helpful in showing dynamics.

  5. amyeyrie says:

    Brilliant Derek…. I would love to read a whole book on musicality and writing from you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s